Gary Hnath is a Partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington DC office, where he focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation and counseling, including disputes involving patent, trademark and copyright infringement and trade secrets. He has participated in numerous District Court cases, several Federal Circuit appeals, and over 40 investigations at the International Trade Commission under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, one of the principal forums for litigating intellectual property disputes involving imported articles.
A leading authority in the area of Section 337 litigation, Gary is a former president of the ITC Trial Lawyers Association and Chair of the ITC Committee of the American Intellectual Property Law Association. He has lectured throughout the United States and Asia and written widely on the subject of Section 337 investigations. While working at the ITC, Gary was lead counsel for the government in Certain Concealed Cabinet Hinges, which raised issues of first impression as to what constitutes a “domestic industry” under the 1988 amendments to Section 337. His position on this issue was adopted by the Administrative Law Judge and the Commission in a decision which is still cited as one of the leading cases in the field.
Gary has successfully represented both patent holders and companies accused of infringement in cases involving a variety of technologies, including high-intensity sweeteners; coenzyme Q10; toner cartridges; sleep apnea products; laminated packaging; linear actuators; medical devices for vein harvesting; personal computers; acetic acid; wireless local area networks; ground fault circuit interrupters; agricultural vehicles; multiplexers used in space satellites; gear couplings used in industrial machinery; and neodymium-iron-boron magnets, to name just a few. He was lead counsel for the first company in China to win a Section 337 case after trial at the ITC. His recent notable victories for clients at the ITC include the successful defense of two manufacturers in China accused of infringing four process patents for the manufacture of sucralose. In this high profile case, the Commission found all of the asserted patents not infringed, and one of the patents invalid, after a hotly contested trial.
Gary has also represented numerous clients on a pro bono basis. For example, in a case for a Washington DC public school bus aide fired from her job as a result of an erroneous drug test, Gary was successful in obtaining a ruling that his client’s constitutional rights had been violated and an order reinstating her with back pay. The court’s decision in that case was cited for several years as one of the leading decisions in the US discussing the constitutionality of random drug testing.
In addition to private practice, Gary has served as law clerk to the Honorable Walter E. Black Jr., US District Court for the District of Maryland and a senior trial attorney with the ITC’s Office of Unfair Import Investigations.
John Molenda is co-chair of Steptoe's Life Sciences Practice, is head of the Intellectual Property Practice for the New York office, and has served on the Firm's Executive Committee. He focuses on patent litigation at the district court and appellate levels, opinions of counsel, due diligence, and inter partes reviews (IPRs). He represents clients across a wide range of technologies, including small molecule pharmaceuticals (Hatch-Waxman), biotherapeutics (biologics), biochemical research tools, genetically modified plants, medical devices, semiconductors, fiber optics, and computer software.
John has developed a particular expertise in life sciences litigation and post-grant proceedings. He was named a 2019 Life Sciences MVP by Law360, and in 2020 was recognized by IAM Patent 1000 as an "extremely smart and meticulous" litigator who has created a "strong [brand] on both the small and large molecule sides." John has served as lead counsel in numerous high-value Hatch-Waxman litigations, including those involving treatments for renal cell carcinoma, mantle cell lymphoma, blood clotting disorders, and opioid addiction. With respect to biologics litigation, John led Steptoe's team in litigating groundbreaking antibody therapies used to treat high cholesterol. He has also coordinated pre-litigation strategy for a global biosimilars program involving a diverse portfolio of monoclonal antibody and cytokine products. At the same time, John routinely counsels clients on the strategic use of IPRs as part of litigation and settlement strategy, and has served as lead counsel in numerous life sciences-related IPRs.
John also maintains an active appellate practice and litigates regularly in the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He has held substantial roles in 25 Federal Circuit appeals, including arguing one of the first pharmaceutical-related IPR appeals. John is active in the Federal Circuit community, currently serving as a Vice Chair of the FCBA's Bench & Bar Planning Committee. Prior to private practice, he served as a Federal Circuit law clerk for the Honorable Alan D. Lourie.
Joseph Lavelle is an experienced patent lawyer, focusing primarily on the preparation and trial of patent infringement cases.
Joseph also has handled a number of successful appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Joseph has more than 25 years of experience litigating patent cases, including many bench and jury trials. He has litigated in most areas of technology, including semiconductors, computers, computer software, telephony, Digital Signal Processing, telematics, waveform encoding, automotive technology, financial services, biotechnology and many others.
In addition to federal district court proceedings, Joseph has tried a number of Section 337 proceedings before the US International Trade Commission (ITC), as well as handled cases before the US Court of Federal Claims and appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. He also is licensed to practice before the USPTO and has successfully handled interference proceedings.
Joseph has vast experience handling litigation and counseling matters at the intersection of competition laws and antitrust laws. He has participated in many of the leading matters in the area of standard setting. Also, he has represented clients in patent-antitrust matters before the FTC and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice.
Lisa M. Ferri is global co-chair of the firm's Intellectual Property practice and the Life Sciences group. She serves as lead trial and appellate counsel on behalf of high-profile companies in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device industries. Lisa is a seasoned and versatile litigator having tried high-stakes cases in federal courts across the country and the International Trade Commission, argued before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. She has significant expertise guiding companies through patent challenges under the Hatch-Waxman Act and Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA).
Lisa also advises companies and investors in the life sciences industry in transactions involving intellectual property including mergers and acquisitions, collaborations, joint ventures and other strategic commercial arrangements. She combines a litigator's perspective with intellectual property expertise to evaluate and identify both risks and opportunities for clients. For instance, Lisa recently provided intellectual property counsel to Bristol-Myers Squibb in its $74 billion acquisition of Celgene.
Clients and peers alike recognize Lisa as a leading intellectual property lawyer. Lisa is a Chambers recognized patent lawyer. Managing Intellectual Property has chosen Lisa as one of the "Top 250 Women in IP" every year since the list's inception in 2013. Who's Who Legal: Patents 2016-2018 named Lisa as a leading patent litigation lawyer. IAM Patent 1000 has consistently ranked Lisa as a Silver Band leading practitioner. The Legal Media Group named her a "Life Sciences Star" and an "IP Star," noting that "Lisa is professional, intelligent, people savvy, tough when need be, and has a great command of the applicable law." LMG Life Sciences Awards considered Lisa a finalist in 2019 for "Patent Strategist of the Year," in 2018 for "New York General Patent Litigator of the Year" and in 2014 for "Hatch-Waxman Litigator of the Year." In addition, she has been recognized in the area of patent litigation by the Legal 500. LMG Life Sciences Awards shortlisted Lisa's victory at the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Biogen IDEC, Inc. and Genentech v. GlaxoSmithKline, a case involving the monoclonal antibody therapy Arzerra® for "Patent Impact Case of the Year."
Lisa has been recognized for her leadership in the legal industry and her commitment to diversity and inclusion in the profession. The New York Law Journal honored her as one of its Distinguished Leaders for 2018. The award is presented to twenty attorneys in leadership roles across the country who have achieved extraordinary results over the past year. In 2017, she was named to Crain's New York Business' inaugural list of "Leading Women Lawyers" in New York City as a trailblazer who juggles a distinguished career and exceptional civic and philanthropic activities. She has also been named a "Woman Worth Watching" by Profiles in Diversity Journal and a "Woman to Watch" by the American Intellectual Property Law Association. Lisa is active in professional organizations devoted to women's leadership, including as a member of the Advisory Board of Women in Law Empowerment Forum (WILEF).
Lisa serves as Chair of the firm's global Women's Leadership Committee and the New York Office Women's Forum and as a member of the firm's Diversity Steering Board.
Lisa is an adjunct professor at Fordham University School of Law where she teaches Patent Litigation.
Madison C. Jellins has more than 20 years of experience in patent litigation and strategic counseling for biopharmaceutical and medical device clients and has served as lead counsel in patent cases in district court and at the Federal Circuit. She is a registered patent attorney and has particular expertise in patent and regulatory strategy, including the FDA approval process for small molecules, biologics, biosimilars, and combination products; Hatch-Waxman litigation strategy; and the new biosimilars pathway. Madison also handles appellate matters before the Federal Circuit and frequently lectures on Federal Circuit case law developments and patent/regulatory issues. She clerked for the Hon. Helen W. Nies, former Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit. She is a Lecturer at Santa Clara University School of Law and was recognized as a Northern California Super Lawyer in IP Litigation in 2009-2012. Madison was formerly a partner in the IP Litigation Group of Alston & Bird LLP and a partner in the Patent Litigation Group at Townsend LLP.
J.D., magnacumlaude, University of San Francisco
Four American Jurisprudence Awards
Comment of the Year Award
Senior Member, Law Review
M.S. Biological Sciences (cancer biology), Stanford University
B.A. Zoology (pre-med), University of Washington
California State Bar
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
All California Courts
Sanj Dutta is a partner in Goodwin’s Technology Companies group and a member of the firm’s Intellectual Property Transactions and Strategies practice. He advises companies on patent prosecution across a variety of technology areas, including blockchain, big data analytics, finance, virtualization, cybersecurity and software security. He also advises companies on IP issues in connection with mergers and acquisitions, as well as technology transfers and licensing. He has handled numerous IP matters in state and federal courts and before the International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB). He has also successfully invalidated highly litigated patents in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
With a background in electrical engineering, Mr. Dutta is well-equipped to understand complex issues that sit at the intersection of law, science and technology, enabling him to handle a wide range of issues, including those relating specifically to computer technologies.