Brian R. Matsui is a partner in Morrison & Foerster LLP’s Appellate and Supreme Court Practice Group. He represents clients from a diverse set of industries in appellate litigation in both federal and state appellate courts.
Mr. Matsui has substantial experience in the federal courts of appeals, having represented clients in appeals in almost every federal appellate court.
Mr. Matsui has briefed and argued many cases in the Federal Circuit. In particular, Mr. Matsui has significant experience on appeals to the Federal Circuit from decisions from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. He has argued patent appeals on behalf of companies in varied industries including mobile device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies, memory manufacturers, movie studios, and software companies.
Additionally, Mr. Matsui has extensive experience arguing and briefing appeals in the Ninth Circuit on a wide range of issues. Recently, he has represented leading financial services companies in appeals throughout the nation and prevailed in a D.C. Circuit appeal against the Securities and Exchange Commission involving the retroactivity of certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.
Mr. Matsui has been involved in more than 35 cases before the Supreme Court of the United States. He has had a lead role in the briefing of merits cases involving the interpretation of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994, the Bankruptcy Code, the Patent Act, and the Dormant Commerce Clause.
Mr. Matsui also dedicates significant time to the less fortunate in pro bono practice. He led the Morrison & Foerster team that was co-counsel for petitioner Terrance Graham in Graham v. Florida, 130 S. Ct. 2011 (2010)—in a successful Eighth Amendment challenge to Florida’s imposition of a “life without the possibility of parole” sentence to a juvenile offender convicted of a non-homicide crime. He also successfully represented a putative class of foster care children in a high-profile abuse and neglect case in the Ninth Circuit in Henry A. v. Willden, 678 F.3d 991 (9th Cir. 2012).
Prior to entering private practice, Mr. Matsui clerked for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the Supreme Court of the United States, Judge Pamela Ann Rymer of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and Judge David F. Levi of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
Mr. Matsui previously chaired (from 2012-2015) the ABA’s seven-person Standing Committee for Amicus Curiae Briefs, which oversees preparation of ABA briefs for filing before the Supreme Court and other courts. He is currently a member of the amicus curiae committee for the American Intellectual Property Law Association, and he was the co-chair of the amicus curiae brief committee for the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association. Mr. Matsui previously served a three-year term as an Appellate Lawyer Representative for the Ninth Circuit, having been selected by the Court of Appeals for that position. Mr. Matsui served as a board member for the D.C. Circuit Historical Society.
Deepak Gupta is the founding principal of Gupta Wessler PLLC. He specializes in Supreme Court, appellate, and complex litigation on a wide range of issues, including constitutional law, class actions, and consumers’ and workers’ rights. He has also taught public interest law and appellate advocacy at Georgetown and American universities.
Deepak has briefed and argued a wide range of statutory and constitutional cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, several state supreme courts, and federal appellate courts nationwide. He argued before the U.S. Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion (2011), a landmark case at the intersection of arbitration, preemption, and class actions. He was lead counsel in Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman (2017), arguing on behalf of a group of small merchants in a constitutional challenge to swipe-fees laws brought in the wake of the $7 billion Visa swipe-fee antitrust settlement. More recently, Deepak was appointed by the Supreme Court to brief and argue in support of a judgment left undefended by the Solicitor General in Smith v. Berryhill. He also serves as counsel for the plaintiffs in two cases challenging President Trump's violations of the Constitution's Emoluments Clauses, CREW v. Trump and District of Columbia v. Trump.
Before founding his firm in 2012, Deepak served as Senior Litigation Counsel and Senior Counsel for Enforcement Strategy at the CFPB. As the first appellate litigator hired under Elizabeth Warren’s leadership, he was instrumental in launching the Bureau’s amicus program, defending its regulations, and working with the Solicitor General’s office on Supreme Court matters. For seven years previously, he was an attorney at Public Citizen Litigation Group, where he founded and directed the Consumer Justice Project and was the Alan Morrison Supreme Court Project Fellow. He received his law degree from Georgetown, studied Sanskrit at Oxford, and received his undergraduate degree in philosophy from Fordham.
Deepak serves on the boards of directors for the Alliance for Justice, The Impact Fund, the Biden Institute, the Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies, the Legal Affairs Committee of the American Association for Justice, and the Class Action Preservation Committee of Public Justice.
Lauren Goldman serves as co-head of Mayer Brown's worldwide Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice and is a member of the Firm's Partnership Board. She practices in the Supreme Court & Appellate group in the firm’s New York office. Lauren has briefed and argued numerous appeals addressing issues of importance to the business community in state and federal courts around the country.
Lauren’s practice is not limited to the appellate courts: she has extensive experience litigating complex legal issues at all levels. In the past five years, she has served as lead legal strategy counsel in connection with more than a dozen high-stakes jury trials, including two cases in which the plaintiffs unsuccessfully sought more than $1 billion in damages. Lauren works closely with trial teams to obtain legal rulings that maximize their ability to obtain a defense verdict, as well as handling all aspects of appellate preservation before, during, and after trial. Lauren has a particular focus on mass actions, and has worked with trial teams to develop legal arguments and strategy in several recent and pending class actions in state and federal courts.
According to Legal 500, clients say that Lauren is "super client-focused, extremely responsive, an excellent writer, and a poised and prepared oral advocate." They describe her as “smart, hardworking, and very analytical,” with an “unmatched ability to work well with other lawyers.” Lauren has been interviewed about Supreme Court developments on CNBC’s “Closing Bell” and FoxBusiness’s “Happy Hour,” as well as by the WSJ Law Blog, The American Lawyer, Newsweek, and the National Law Journal, and has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Fortune, and CNNMoney, among other publications.
Lauren is particularly experienced in briefing and arguing punitive damages issues; she has worked on many successful appeals from large punitive awards, including Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S. Ct. 1057 (2007). Lauren has also handled legal issues at retrials limited to the amount of punitive and/or compensatory damages in Oregon, California, and Florida; in each case, the retrial jury awarded a fraction of the original jury’s verdict. Lauren writes and speaks regularly on the subject of punitive damages law and is a co-author of the chapter on punitive damages in the West treatise Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts.
Lauren also writes and speaks often about appellate practice more generally, and is a co-author of Mayer Brown’s Federal Appellate Practice treatise, published by BNA Books in December 2008 and again in December 2013.
Lauren received her JD magna cum laude from New York University School of Law, where she was Order of the Coif and a member of the Law Review. In addition, she won the law school’s moot court competition. Following graduation, she served as a law clerk to Judge Dennis Jacobs of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mark Harris is a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP and co-head of its Appellate Practice Group, which was honored in 2011 by Law360 as one of five Appellate Practices of the Year nationally, and by the National Law Journal with a spot on its annual “Appellate Hot List.” Most recently, the American Lawyer named Mark its “Litigator of the Week” for his representation of Biosig Instruments before the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court. Mark is also a member of Proskauer’s White-Collar Defense & Investigations and Securities Litigation Groups, concentrating his practice in the areas of white-collar criminal defense and related litigation, and representing both institutional and individual clients in government investigations and prosecutions.
Mark is a former clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justices John Paul Stevens and Lewis Powell, Jr., and to Judge Joel Flaum of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Mark served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, during which he prosecuted a broad spectrum of federal crimes, including health-care fraud, financial fraud, and corporate embezzlement, and tried a number of jury trials and argued before the Second Circuit.
Mark has handled dozens of cases in the U.S. Supreme Court and other appellate courts in areas spanning criminal law, sentencing, copyright, labor relations, employment law, and administrative law. In 2015, he successfully represented Nextel Communications before the Second Circuit, which vacated the certification of a class of hundreds of former employees who had brought fiduciary and other claims against the company. In some of his other major cases, he served as co-counsel to the petitioner in Hill v. United States, in which the Supreme Court applied the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 to benefit defendants retroactively; he helped persuade the Second Circuit to reverse the conviction of a former Gen Re executive; he successfully represented electronic publishers before the Supreme Court in Reed Elsevier Inc. v. Muchnick, named the 2010 “U.S. Copyright Case of the Year” by Managing Intellectual Property Magazine; and he briefed and argued the American Bar Association’s successful challenge to the Federal Trade Commission’s “Red Flags Rule.”
Since 1996, Mark has been a member of the Board of Editors of the Federal Sentencing Reporter and a frequent contributor. His work on behalf of non-U.S. clients was featured in the American Lawyer’s 2006 Litigation supplement. He has lectured on both appellate practice and criminal law before the International Bar Association, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, PLI, and the ABA Sections of Litigation, Criminal Law, and Employment and Labor Law. He has appeared on WCBS-TV , NY1, Bloomberg Radio, FM News 101.9, and WINS AM-1010, and has been featured in the National Law Journal, New York Law Journal, Law360, Legal Times, and other publications.
White Collar Defense & Investigations
Non-Compete & Trade Secrets
Harvard Law School, J.D., 1992 magna cum laude
Supervising Editor, Harvard Law Review
Harvard College, A.B., 1989 magna cum laude Phi Beta Kappa
District of Columbia
Richard B. Rosenthal is a solo appellate lawyer who handles appeals across the country, often on behalf of plaintiffs, from his offices in Miami and San Francisco. He is a former law clerk to the Honorable Levin H. Campbell of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, and to the Honorable Edward B. Davis, Chief Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
Mr. Rosenthal has served as a personal attorney to Barack Obama and as Statewide Lead Counsel to the Obama for America presidential campaign in Florida. His clients have also included two United States Senators; a sitting Chief U.S. District Judge; a retired Appellate Justice from California; Secretary of Defense Medal of Freedom recipients; a Hall of Fame baseball star; a major political party in Florida; the nation’s largest independent record label; a police labor union; various nonprofit organizations, trade, and professional associations; and individuals of every background and station.
Mr. Rosenthal has achieved the rare distinction of having been named simultaneously to “Super Lawyer” and “Best Lawyer” lists in two states: Florida and California. He is a frequent speaker at continuing legal education events, has served as an adjunct professor of law, and has delivered guest lectures at various law schools including Yale, Columbia, Stanford, Michigan, as well as international lectures on the topic of American Democracy and American Values at law schools in Siberia, Kyrgyzstan, and Ukraine. He can be reached at email@example.com
One of five firm lawyers to have clerked at the U.S. Supreme Court, Kevin Newsom is chair of the firm’s appellate group. Before joining the firm, Kevin served as Alabama's Solicitor General. Kevin has argued four cases in the U.S. Supreme Court and at least 35 more in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits, as well as in state supreme and appellate courts. Kevin also regularly briefs and argues critical motions in trial courts and the JPML.
Pursuant to the appointment of Chief Justice John Roberts, Kevin serves on the 10-person Advisory Committee on Appellate Rules, which considers amendments and improvements to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Kevin is an elected Fellow of the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers, holds a "Tier 1" ranking for appellate law in Chambers USA, and is listed in The Best Lawyers in America in the field of appellate law. In 2007, The American Lawyer magazine named Kevin one of its "Fab Fifty"—the top 50 litigators in the country under the age of 45—and in 2010, Law360.com named Kevin one of the nation’s top 10 appellate lawyers under the age of 40.
Kevin served as a law clerk to Justice David Souter of the U.S. Supreme Court and to Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Kevin received a B.A. from Samford University, summa cum laude, and his J.D. from Harvard Law School, magna cum laude, where he served on the Harvard Law Review.
Stephen Kinnaird is a partner at Paul Hastings LLP and co-chair of its Appellate Practice. He has represented clients in numerous cases in the United States Supreme Court, the federal courts of appeals and district courts, and state appellate courts. Mr. Kinnaird has handled matters involving intellectual and real property, antitrust, environmental, transportation, administrative, criminal, tort, and constitutional law, among others.
Mr. Kinnaird has briefed and argued multiple cases in the U.S. Supreme Court. He argued Padilla v. Kentucky, in which the Court ruled in favor of firm client Jose Padilla in holding that the Sixth Amendment imposed duties upon defense counsel to advise criminal defendants of the deportation consequences of criminal convictions. Mr. Kinnaird was featured on the cover of the July/August 2010 issue of The American Lawyer in a story discussing Padilla as the capstone of the firm's pro bono initiatives. Lawyers USA named Mr. Kinnaird one of its nine Lawyers of the Year in 2010. In 2013, Mr. Kinnaird successfully argued Peugh v. United States, in which the Supreme Court held by 5-4 decision that the Ex Post Facto Clause bars retroactive application of amendments to the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines that raise recommended sentencing ranges. In 2016, the Supreme Court appointed Mr. Kinnaird as amicus curiae to defend the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in McLane Co. v. EEOC. Other notable matters include engagements for:
an electronics manufacturer in the U.S. Supreme Court in a case involving removal of mass actions under the Class Action Fairness Act;
a major league baseball team in the U.S. Supreme Court in a case involving taxation of back pay;
a telecommunications company in the U.S. Supreme Court and the courts of appeals in cases establishing rules of competitive access to network facilities under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and addressing takings and sovereign immunity defenses;
a railroad company in the U.S. Supreme Court in a case addressing the legal standard for causation by contributory negligence;
an energy company in the U.S. Supreme Court in a case concerning rights to coalbed methane in property derived from federal land grants;
Prior to entering private practice, Mr. Kinnaird served as a law clerk to Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the United States Supreme Court, and to Judge John M. Walker, Jr. of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mr. Kinnaird received a B.A. in English Language and Literature from Yale University, summa cum laude. He received an M.A. in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics from Oxford University, which he attended on a Rhodes Scholarship. He received a J.D. from Yale Law School, where he served as Articles Editor on the Yale Law Journal and was awarded three faculty prizes for scholarship.