Skip to main content
Create Account
About PLI PLUS
Help
Contact Us
Questions? Comments?
Contact us.
Email:
PLUS@pli.edu
Phone:
877.900.5291
PLI.edu
SIGN IN
Search
Browse
All Content
Books
- Answer Books
- Course Handbooks
- Journals
- Treatises
Forms
Transcripts
My Bookshelf
My History
< Back To Results
1 in 1 results
Previous Result
Next Result
From the Trenches: High Profile Trials 2014
Chair(s):
Maria E. Douvas, Reed Brodsky
Practice Area:
Litigation
Published:
Sep 2014
ISBN:
9781402423000
PLI Item #:
51779
CHB Spine #:
H960
This version is not current.
Click here for the most recent version.
Terms & Connectors
Natural Language
Email
Print
Add To Bookshelf
Permalink
Table of Contents
Related Items
Select All
Front Matter
Faculty Bios
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. U.S. v. Martoma, 12 Cr. 0973 (PGG), Opening Statements
Chapter 2. U.S. v. Martoma, 12 Cr. 0973 (PGG), Closing Arguments
Chapter 3. U.S. v. Martoma, 12 Cr. 0973 (PGG), Rebuttal
Chapter 4. U.S. v. Newman, et al., 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Anthony Chiasson’s Motion for Severance
Chapter 5. U.S. v. Newman, et al., 12-CR-00121 (RJS), Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Todd Newman’s Motion for Severance and for Expedited Disclosure of Information Essential to the Preparation of His Defense
Chapter 6. U.S. v. Newman, et al., 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Government’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motions of Defendants Todd Newman, Anthony Chiasson, and Jon Horvath for Severance
Chapter 7. U.S. v. Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson, 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Government’s Motion in Limine for Additional Expert Disclosures and to Preclude Certain Expert Testimony
Chapter 8. U.S. v. Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson, 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Defendant Anthony Chiasson’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Government’s Motion in Limine for Additional Expert Disclosures and to Preclude Certain Expert Testimony
Chapter 9. U.S. v. Todd Newman and Anthony Chiasson, 12-CR-00121 (RJS), Memorandum of Law of Defendant Todd Newman in Opposition to the Government’s Motions In Limine for Additional Expert Disclosures and to Preclude Certain Expert Testimony
Chapter 10. U.S. v. Steinberg, 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Indictment
Chapter 11. U.S. v. Steinberg, 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Opening Statements
Chapter 12. U.S. v. Steinberg, 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Closing Statements and Rebuttal
Chapter 13. SEC v. Steinberg, 13 Civ. 2082 (HB), Government’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Application to Intervene and for a Limited Stay of Discovery
Chapter 14. SEC v. Steinberg, 13 Civ. 2082 (HB), Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the United States Attorney’s Application to Intervene and for a Limited Stay of Discovery
Chapter 15. U.S. v. Steinberg, 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Government’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence of Parallel Trading
Chapter 16. U.S. v. Steinberg, 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Michael Steinberg’s Response to Government’s Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence of Parallel Trading
Chapter 17. U.S. v. Steinberg, 12 Cr. 121 (RJS), Government’s Letter Seeking to Preclude Evidence
Chapter 18. SEC v. Tourre, 10 Cv. 3299 (KBF), Opening Statements
Chapter 19. SEC v. Tourre, SEC’s Opening (PowerPoint slides)
Chapter 20. SEC v. Tourre, 10 Cv. 3229 (KBF), Closing Statements
Chapter 21. SEC v. Tourre, 10 Civ. 3229 (KBF), Memorandum Decision & Order
Chapter 22. SEC v. Tourre, 10 Civ. 3229 (KBF), Opinion & Order
Chapter 23. Chevron Corporation, et al. v. Joseph A. Berlinger, et al., 10-1918-cv(L), 10-1966-cv(CON), Appeal
Chapter 24. Chevron Corporation v. Steven Donziger, et al., 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK), Opinion on Motions to Compel and for Sanctions
Chapter 25. Chevron Corporation v. Steven Donziger, et al., 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK), Opinion
Index
About Us
